I've been enjoying blogs a lot more lately. Thanks to
Kathleen Soler, I've discovered
RSSOwl, the news feed reader. Underneath it all, I've always been a typical backwards Louisianian, despite my education and travel record. I had written off social media and the technologies associated with it long ago. Now, a whole new world of information and opportunity has opened up to me. Where before I was a bit overwhelmed by the daunting task of foraging for information and hunting down important news bits in the sprawled out megatropolis of the interwebs, I now visit a customized supermarket of articles, lined up in clean, neatly organized aisles and stamped with their production date right next to the headline. This means that information can be consumed faster, more selectively.
As many of my friends and family know, I am a very hungry person. Not just for food but information. But just because its available and free doesn't mean you should put it in your body. I had this epiphany the other day after a very timely article from
NPR. In this report, Clay Johnson speaks about his concept of the information diet, which recognizes that some information is healthier than others and recommends consuming information low on the 'information food chain' and sticking close to sources. While not always practical, his message is a strong one that could be aimed at any number of generations. Highly processed news is bad. I generally reject mainstream news and political commentary. But I have been watching The Daily Show and The Colbert Report a lot lately. So much for my New Year's resolutions. It may not be the most thorough or unbiased news coverage but the shows tap into (and liberate, at least momentarily) some deeply troubling existential feelings about democracy in United States today. Our most visible representatives (who in a certain light have a responsibility as public educators and liaisons between the public and legal realm) are insincere, immoral and manipulative. Our economy is collapsing, gas prices rise. So the Stewart-Colbert snack is somewhat of a comfort food.
One of my favorite leisure reading blogs is Ohio naturalist Jim McCormac's
Birds and Biodiversity. His colorful language and encyclopedic knowledge of eastern flora and fauna are first rate. I've had a chance to meet him twice now. The first time, I was at the Ohio Vernal Pool Partnership Workshop as we stood around one of these ephemeral wetlands filled with snow melt, our voices muffled by the high peeps and clicks of hundred of spring peepers and chorus frogs. He pointed his massive camera to snap macros of spotted salamanders migrating across the foot path. He talked quickly and asked lots of questions to our guide, dipping for
fairy shrimp out of the teeming water. I met him again at Camp Kern's 101 Environmental Education Conference where he gave a presentation on the Olentangy River. I've admired him for some time and I recommend his writing.
Another good blog is
Renewing the Commons. This blog is by Conor Stedman, a Field Naturalist at the University of Vermont, whom I also met while visiting UVM as a prospective graduate student. His focus on regenerative agriculture, community spaces and host of over eco-social and conservation topics is very eye-opening. The man is extremely intelligent and not the least bit naive about what it will take to solve the problems of future. His blog is perhaps a good entry point into what I think of as the New England "Place movement", going strong since the days of Robert Frost and now boasting a number of fascinating, progressive enterprises.
But the blog list could go on and on and I don't want to overwhelm you. I'm getting tired too, so I'll try to wrap this up. What I'm finding is that I had not fully comprehended the implication of the the information age and how it has been affecting (positively) the collective knowledge and research of the new generation. It is not coincidence that stories of a new era are popping up in large publications across the country. The mycelium runs deep and wide; a cultural revolution has been at work. In the wake of political disillusionment, economic collapse, blatant corporate and political abuses and extreme resource degradation, the reintegration of sustainable land use practices and the rebuilding of traditional knowledge and folkways is becoming more possible. Strangely enough, technology has been one of the few tools able to empower the many (dare I say 99%?) who have otherwise felt powerless against the titanic momentum of big money and big politics. It is in the peer-to-peer environment of the web that the new journalists are born onto the scene. And though they may not talk as loud as those in old media, they espouse many powerful and equally viable narratives about what are civilization might become. The New England School has much to offer like
Center for Whole Communities,
PLACE, CO-SEED and
Vermont Family Forests. I've got my reading and research cut out for me if I ever want to learn anything from them. I will try to share small miracles as I discover them. But in leaving, what do you think? I can find very few if any blogs in Louisiana that report on natural history, local conservation issues, local research. Even as Baton Rouge Progressive Network brings community voices on the airwaves via the hopeful
Community Radio, our digital supermarket for locally grown, organic information is still in its infancy. This doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't activity down on the ground. The discussion most people are having, focuses on the large, political issues; confrontation and taking down the big polluters or the bad developers. But there is a lack of biodiversity information that may reflect on our failure to combine valuable resources and their powerful role in the sustainability movement. It also means that there is less probability of cross pollination between the many groups. I used to feel that Louisiana is a dead zone and--in certain densely populated, overly developed areas-- a cultural sink. The
225Magazine helped me to think otherwise, but it is time that we get a few more citizen reporters on the ground. Consider it local, organically grown information.